Investigate Allegations of Violations

Investigate allegations of violations of applicable national and international law and, where appropriate, duly prosecute perpetrators.

The Declaration and the Guidelines are useful tools to promote compliance with applicable international and national legal frameworks, and to promote accountability when violations occur. Attacks on schools in contravention of international humanitarian law should be investigated and those responsible duly prosecuted. A country’s legislation should include effective penal sanctions for breaches of international human rights and humanitarian law. Effective national accountability mechanisms are a key measure to deter future unlawful attacks against educational facilities, students, and teachers during armed conflict.

In addition to national accountability mechanisms, states may make use of other existing mechanisms, such as the United Nations treaty bodies, fact-finding commissions, human rights commissions, ad hoc international criminal tribunals, and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Below is a non-exhaustive list of recommended actions to be undertaken by governments to implement the commitment on ensuring accountability for attacks on educational facilities, students, and staff during armed conflict.

Ensure that domestic law and policies enable the effective and systematic investigation of allegations of attacks on educational facilities, students, and teachers. Consider explicitly prohibiting in national law, attacks on educational facilities in contravention with international law;

Investigate allegations of applicable international law including sexual and gender-based violence by parties to the conflict at, or on the way to schools or universities;

Collect and preserve evidence in a way that will permit it to be used and bring cases to national and military courts and monitor legal compliance;

Support accountability measures through international channels such as the ICC, the Human Rights Council, the UN Security Council Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict, UN treaty monitoring bodies, including the Committee of the Rights of the Child, and the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the UN’s Special Country Rapporteurs and Thematic Rapporteurs on relevant issues, such as the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education;

Ensure that affected and at-risk populations, particularly female survivors of attacks on education, can access the justice system, for example, by providing free access to legal assistance.


Argentina: In the manual on international law of armed conflict, Argentina explicitly mentions educational facilities in the definition of war crimes: “Other grave violations of the laws and customary practice applicable in non-international armed conflicts, within the framework of international law…: Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to … education … provided they are not military objectives.” - Ministério de Defensa, Manual de derecho International de los Conflictos Armados, 2010, p. 94.

Democratic Republic of Congo: From a trial of an alleged perpetrator of attacks on educational facilities: “Ives Kahwa Panga Mandro (“Chief Kahwa”), founder of the Party for Unity and Safeguarding of the Integrity of Congo, was convicted by an Ituri Military Tribunal in August 2006 on six charges, including the war crime of intentionally directing attacks against a building dedicated to education, for attacks against schools committed in October 2002. Citing the Democratic Republic of Congo’s constitution’s provision allowing courts and military tribunals to apply international treaties, the tribunal directly applied the Rome Statute’s war crime of intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to education. Kahwa received a 20- year sentence. - Human Rights Watch, Schools and Armed Conflict, A Global Survey of Domestic Laws and State Practice Protecting Schools from Attack and Military Use, July 20, 2011, pp.44-45

International Criminal Court: The trial of Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga Dyilo included recognition of a destroyed school as a represented victim. Thomas Lubanga was charged by the ICC with conscripting children under the age of 15 and using them in hostilities. A total of 99 victims participated in the trial and were represented by seven lawyers. It was stated in court documents that “one of these victims is a school principal who is considered a victim both in his own personal right (and as an indirect victim as he was beaten when trying to intervene in the recruitment of children as soldiers from his school), but also as the representative of his school itself which was destroyed, and, as of January 2009 had not been rebuilt.” - ICC, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubango Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/05, Decision on the Applications by Victims to Participate in the Proceedings (December 15, 2008), paras. 105-111. See also ICC, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubango Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06-T-107-ENG ET WT, Procedural Matters (Open Session) (January 26, 2009), pp. 44-45.

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: In an indictment of alleged perpetrators of attacks on education institutions, the ICTY prosecutors stated that one of the perpetrators “knew or had reason to know that members of the 4th Military Police Battalion who were under his command and control were about to engage in the wanton destruction and plunder of Bosnian Muslim dwellings, businesses, institutions dedicated to religion or education, civilian personal property and livestock…” and therefore had committed a violation of the laws or customs of war.”- International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Prosecutor v. Pasko Ljubicic: Corrected Amended Indictment (The Hague, September 26, 2000). See also International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Milodrag Jokic, and Vladimir Kovacevic: Amended Indictment (March 31, 2003).

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH): The FIDH published a Q&A regarding the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s investigation into the situation in Afghanistan. The Q&A states that the denial of education for girls based on their gender can amount to a crime against humanity. In the ICC investigation, the Office of the Prosecutor has found that alleged attacks on schools, more specifically schools for girls, resulting in many girls being denied access to education, could amount to a war crime under Article 8(2)(b)(ix) of the Rome Statute. The Prosecutor’s request for authorization can be found here, and there are numerous references to attacks on education, particularly girls’ education.

Eritrea-Ethiopian Claims Commission: Compensation was awarded for attacks on schools: “Having found that Ethiopia permitted looting and burning of structures in the town of Guluj during May and June 2000, the Commission found Ethiopia liable for 90% of the total loss and damage to property in Guluj during that time. After applying the 90% factor, Eritrea sought compensation of ERN 9,688,554 plus US$39,502 in relation to fifteen buildings or groups of buildings in Guluj: the Health Center, Ministry of Health Warehouse, Sub-Zoba Administration, Town Administration Building, Police Station, Courthouse, Water Authority, schools, Sub-Zoba Ministry of Agriculture, Sub-Zoba PFDJ Office, Land Transport Office, Sub-Zoba NUEYS Office, NUEW facilities, gas stations and Catholic Church. Ethiopia offered no specific defense to Eritrea’s claims on any of these buildings... The Commission awards Eritrea compensation in the amount of US$900,000 for 90% of the total loss and damage to the buildings or groups of buildings listed above […].”- Eritrea Ethiopia Claims Commission, Final Ward: Eritrea’s Damages Claims, between The State of Eritrea and The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.

European Court of Human Rights: The European Court of Human Rights found that Russia violated the right to life of 409 victims in the 2004 attack on a school in Beslan, because “…at least several days in advance the authorities had sufficiently specific information about a planned terrorist attack in the areas in the vicinity of the Malgobek District in Ingushetia and targeting an educational facility on 1 September…A threat of this kind clearly indicated a real and immediate risk to the lives of the potential target population, including a vulnerable group of schoolchildren and their entourage...” Although some measures were taken to mitigate the risk, the Court found that “in general the preventive measures in the present case could be characterized as inadequate.” The Court also found “that there has been a breach of the positive obligations under Article 2 [on the right to life] of the [European] Convention [on Human Rights] in respect of all applicants in the present case.”- European Court of Human Rights, Case of Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, 2017, paras 491-493.